Camera sensors, megapixels and how they affect post-production results!
Nội dung
In this article, we want to talk about the differences between sensor types, sizes, megapixels and how they affect post-production, while keeping engineering to a minimum.
Sensor
Sensors today come in a number of different types and sizes. Of these, the two most common types are CCD and CMOS. While other types of sensors still exist, we won't cover them. The CCD or Charge-Coupled Device sensor is the first type used for digital cameras, while the CMOS or complementary Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor sensor is the newest type of sensor (not exactly new but newer) used in digital camera technology. The difference between CMOS and CCD is in how the sensor captures and converts light into a digital image. The CCD sensor filters light particles through a single node, which converts the particles to an electrical charge at the same time. While the CMOS sensor converts each individual particle. Since CCD sensors charge all the light particles at once, they use a significant amount of energy compared to CMOS sensors (i.e. affecting things like battery life, susceptibility to overheating, poor performance in low light, slow processing). CMOS sensors were initially introduced as an alternative to the CCD type, because they offer much cheaper manufacturing costs, more transparent data, and lower power consumption as well. CMOS sensors have replaced all CCDs today. Due to the outdated CCD sensor, we won't go into specific pros and cons. Because both can produce great image quality and both have their pros and cons. CCD sensors are still used in some medium format cameras, but they are also slowly transitioning to CMOS sensors. Instead of arguing which is better of the two, we'll focus on how sensor size and megapixels affect post-production.Megapixels
There are many articles on the web discussing the "megapixel myth", about whether more megapixels means better image quality? Over the years, manufacturers have raced to take the lead by increasing the number of megapixels in their camera bodies, in order to "step one up" from their competitors. This increases sales, because everyone automatically assumes that larger quantity means better quality. However, this is not always true. We've all seen, advertised for new iPhone and Android devices featuring bigger and bigger megapixel cameras year after year or point, hot new capture with 20 megapixels. Does that mean that a 20-megapixel point and shoot is as good as a 20-megapixel full-frame professional DSLR? To better understand this, let's first look at the dimensions of the most popular sensors on the market today:- Medium format = 50.7 x 39mm (Kodak)
- Full frame = 36mm x 24mm
- ASP-H = 28.1mm x 18.7mm (Canon)
- ASP-C = 23.6mm x 15.8mm (Nikon, Sony, etc.)
- ASP-C = 22.2 x14.8mm (Canon)
- Four thirds = 17.3mm x 13mm (mirrorless)
- 1/1.7IN = 7.6mm x 5.7mm (compact camera)
- 1.2.3 IN = 5.7mm x 4.2mm (compact camera)